Key Takeaways
The $2.28T CARES Act is the largest rescue package in US history.
It uses fiscal and monetary policy to stabilize the economy.
Unlike the 2008 recession, this is an external factor, not financial.
Investing
Zoe Team
5 min read
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the CARES Act?
A $2.28 trillion bipartisan stimulus package designed to provide economic relief to Americans and businesses during the pandemic.
How does fiscal policy differ from monetary policy?
Fiscal policy involves government tax and spending decisions; monetary policy is managed by the Federal Reserve to control money supply.
Why is the ‘last mile’ of aid important?
It ensures financial support reaches the individuals and businesses directly affected by the crisis efficiently.
Amid storms of dreary news, the $2.28 trillion bipartisan coronavirus stimulus package seems, at first glance, like the much-needed aid the country needs. With so much at stake, it is crucial to understand how it will help this public health emergency and the economy.
As the Emergency Responses Phases chart shows, government financial initiatives are usually applied in the “response” and “recovery phases” during Pandemics. The government has two main financial tools for the response and recovery phases of a natural disaster: fiscal policy, through which it determines the appropriate level of taxes and spending; and monetary policy, through which it manages the supply of money.
The government healthcare “response” to slow down the Coronavirus speed of contagion has been to set social distancing guidelines and mandate mass lockdowns. These healthcare initiatives are absolutely necessary to save lives, but the economic collateral damage is shutting down a lot of economic activity. Due to this impromptu economic shutdown, Americans will soon see a recession.
Is This Our Generation’s Great Depression?
The swift closing down of the economy is something that this country has not seen at this scale in modern times. As the chart shows below, the coronavirus puts 37 million U.S. jobs at risk, those of which are mostly low-wage and thus have a thin safety-net. From the job market’s perspective, this could be the most severe recession in our country’s history.
Having said that, the recession’s duration and breadth are unlikely to be a “Great Depression” type magnitude. To provide some context, the below chart shows past recessions throughout history. The size of each circle shows the severity and the Y-axis the duration of the recession. As you can see, there is a big difference between the Great Depression in the 1930s and the Great Recession in 2008-09, both in duration ( 3.5 vs 1.5 years) and severity (-26% vs -4.5% economic contraction.)
The main difference between the Great Depression and the Great Recession was proactive efforts by the government. In 2008, the government worked to maintain levels of employment and stable prices, while that was not the case in 1929. In fact, in 1929, social security, Medicaid & Medicare, FDIC insurance or unemployment insurance simply did not exist. From that perspective, the government’s swift new measures to provide a “floor” to the economy through both its fiscal and monetary policy are social safety nets that did not occur during the Great Depression.
Even when comparing this recession to the Great Recession of 2008, there are stark differences. As the Brooking’s Institute points out, the Great Recession resulted out of financial imbalances—starting primarily in the housing sector. Meanwhile, the Coronavirus pandemic is a totally external factor. For government economic policymakers, there is another big difference. In 2008, there were delays in passing stimulus packages as many worried that remedies such as mortgage relief or bailing out the banks would encourage people to make and take riskier loans in the future, confident that the federal government would bail them out if things went wrong. “Moral hazard“ is simply not a concern this time around; as no one will wish for a virus in the future in the hopes of receiving government aid. In other words, there likely will be less legislative roadblocks if more aid is necessary this time around. With this historical context in mind, let’s now dig into the Fiscal and Monetary policy packages.
Fiscal Aid
Fiscal policy is implemented through Congress and the Presidential branches of government. Since the Great Depression, U.S fiscal policy has enacted a more “counter-cyclical” approach by spending more in recessions to soften the blow to the broader economy. Over the last few days, Congress and the President took this approach by signing the $2.28 trillion coronavirus stimulus package, Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act). The CARES Act is the largest rescue package in American history. As per the below visual, the package will have wide-reaching impacts. It will send money directly to Americans homes, small businesses, and greatly expand unemployment coverage among a number of other initiatives.
Central Bank to the Rescue
Monetary policy is implemented through the Federal Reserve System, an independent U.S. government agency. The “Fed” as it is often called, has three main tools for maintaining control over the supply of money and credit in the economy.
Buying and selling government securities from and to banks to increase or decrease the money supply in circulation.
Setting the interest rate (discount rate) that commercial banks pay to borrow funds from Reserve Banks.
Specifying what reserves deposit-taking banks must set aside.
Since the Great Recession of 2008, the Fed has a slew of new tools to keep the financial system functioning in times of emergency. When facing the Corona pandemic, the Fed acted swiftly to implement all the existing emergency initiatives, as well as creating a number of new ones, per the below chart.
Will These Policy Responses Be Enough?
When placing the recent monetary and fiscal emergency responses in a historical context, it is fair to say that the government has moved swiftly and boldly to pass these initiatives into laws. Having said that, we are dealing with an emergency of a scope not experienced in the modern era, so it is difficult to evaluate if the economy will need more in the near future.
For instance, as Augustin Carstens, the General Manager of the Bank for International Settlements, pointed out, this time around the central bank’s interventions to quell the crisis will need to reach individuals and businesses who are the core victims of the natural disaster. The ‘last mile’ of this channel is not yet in place and needs to be bridged with urgency. If current initiatives are not implemented quickly, more might need to be done later to deal with the negative effects of being too late the first time around.
As we continue navigating the impacts of the coronavirus government stimulus package, we need to be keenly aware that it impacts every American’s finances differently. Be it a small business owner or an individual seeking to understand how this will affect their wallet, our next blog will evaluate the singular impacts for you.
Disclosures: Zoe Financial, Inc. ("Zoe Financial") is an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Zoe Financial provides investment advisory services and access to independent registered investment advisers through its platform. The information provided by Zoe Financial is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as personalized investment advice or as an offer to buy or sell any security. All investments involve risk, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Clients should consult with their own financial, tax, or legal professionals before making any investment decisions. The material presented by Zoe Financial is for informational purposes only and is not intended to serve as a substitute for personalized investment advice or as a recommendation or solicitation of any particular security, strategy, or investment product. Material presented has been gathered from sources believed to be reliable, however Adviser cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information, and certain information presented here may have been condensed or summarized from its original source. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Zoe Financial does not provide legal or tax advice, and nothing contained in these materials should be taken as legal or tax advice. SEC Registration does not constitute an endorsement of Zoe Financial by the SEC nor does it indicate that Zoe Financial has attained a particular level of skill or ability. The sole purpose of this material is to inform, and it in no way is intended to be an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any security, other investment or service, or to attract any funds or deposits. Investments mentioned may not be appropriate for all clients. Before making any investment, each investor should carefully consider the risks associated with the investment, as discussed in the applicable offering memorandum, and make a determination based upon their own particular circumstances, that the investment is consistent with their investment objectives and risk tolerance. Lower expenses do not guarantee better investment performance. Certain information contained herein may constitute forward-looking statements. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events, results or the performance of a fund may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements.
