Investing
Zoe Team
4 min read
ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investing is compatible with achieving competitive market returns.
ESG factors help companies manage risks better, which can lead to improved long-term financial performance.
Prioritizing ESG criteria supports sustainable growth without sacrificing portfolio profitability.
No, evidence suggests that companies with strong ESG profiles can be more resilient and perform well over time.
Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria used to screen investments for sustainability and ethical practices.
Yes, ESG integration is a strategy aimed at identifying well-managed, high-quality companies for long-term growth.
Companies paying attention to ESG can better manage risk, positively impacting their bottom line. Moreover, 80% of CEOs view sustainability as a way of gaining a competitive advantage for their business.
Believe it or not, people used to believe investing in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) companies meant giving up a return. Hard to believe, I know, when the reality is the contrary!
Companies paying attention to ESG can better manage risk, positively impacting their bottom line. Moreover, 80% of CEOs view sustainability as a way of gaining a competitive advantage for their business.
Traditionally, the idea of social responsibility through investing meant removing specific products, potentially giving up returns, and taking a more values-based approach. Social responsibility has evolved. Now doing good doesn’t mean sacrificing shareholder value. It’s quite the opposite. The traditional way of investing is changing, and a new philosophy is emerging.
The social component of ESG helps an investor express a preference for companies that positively impact their communities and maintain safe and inclusive work environments. A company’s board and C-suite can influence these decisions. “Governance” considers the conflict of interest in executive compensation and board structure. An accountable board has proven to be a more productive one.
Companies that pay attention to ESG issues can not only have a positive impact but can also boost shareholder value. Examples of that value are more effective risk management, reduced regulatory intervention, and resource efficiency. By incorporating ESG issues into a sustainability framework, corporations will ultimately improve performance over the long term.
Most myths include characters and their approach to different situations. A big part of this myth is how investment managers evaluate a company’s ESG impact. Lucky for us, this approach has also evolved. Before, investors would remove companies from a portfolio that did not meet ESG standards. Now a more effective change agent has gained traction: shareholder advocacy.
The shareholder advocacy approach focuses on leveraging the power of stock ownership in publicly traded companies. Doing so helps encourage environmental, social, and governance awareness and action. Shareholder advocacy has been around for quite some time, but today the term is more aligned with ESG. Investors dedicated to this approach believe that improving a company’s sustainability will ultimately make the company a better long-term investment.
For example, Impax Asset Management includes board and executive diversity as part of its advocacy framework. Impax not only votes “no” on companies with all-male boards but will also propose policies to improve gender balance. Impax also pursues pay equity. Research shows that companies attract more talent when they work to close the gender wage gap.
Calvert, another fund management company, engages in ESG in various ways. One of their most notable stances is their take on gun control. Calvert does not invest in gun manufacturers; they believe guns are high risk to investors and communities. After the Parkland School shooting in 2018, Calvert reached out to retailers who sell firearms and urged them to eliminate the portion of their business involving assault rifles and automatic weapons. After Calvert’s recommendation, one retailer did announce it would change its policy on gun sales.
It is essential to recognize the impact of raising ESG concerns, no matter how small the stake is in one company. Significant ownership in a public company is not required to have a voice and present a resolution that will encourage a board to act.
Lastly, not all ESG investment management strategies may use thorough and thoughtful principles. That is why entities like USSIF (The Form for Sustainable and Responsible Investing) and others are making regulatory comments to improve the quality of reporting around ESG factors.
Specifically, USSIF has recommended consistent greenhouse gas emission reporting and is required to create a uniform ESG investment fund reporting methodology. As the popularity of ESG grows, investors should expect better transparency and more choice.
Social concerns emerge, and there is more visibility and access to resources that address social concerns. For example, it is no mystery that climate change impacts affect us now more than ever. According to USSIF, carbon emissions are the number one issue of interest driving ESG investing. 2022 has spotlighted the economic and humanitarian cost of climate behavior, thus garnering more interest in sustainable investing.
Awareness is the first step. It’s no coincidence that the title of this blog attracted you. After reading this article, you either broke the myth that ESG investing meant giving up returns or expand your knowledge on the topic. Are you ready to take the next step? Aligning your investments to your values is an exciting financial goal, and you now have the knowledge to meet them.
Disclosures: Zoe Financial, Inc. ("Zoe Financial") is an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Zoe Financial provides investment advisory services and access to independent registered investment advisers through its platform. The information provided by Zoe Financial is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as personalized investment advice or as an offer to buy or sell any security. All investments involve risk, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Clients should consult with their own financial, tax, or legal professionals before making any investment decisions. The material presented by Zoe Financial is for informational purposes only and is not intended to serve as a substitute for personalized investment advice or as a recommendation or solicitation of any particular security, strategy, or investment product. Material presented has been gathered from sources believed to be reliable, however Adviser cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information, and certain information presented here may have been condensed or summarized from its original source. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Zoe Financial does not provide legal or tax advice, and nothing contained in these materials should be taken as legal or tax advice. SEC Registration does not constitute an endorsement of Zoe Financial by the SEC nor does it indicate that Zoe Financial has attained a particular level of skill or ability. The sole purpose of this material is to inform, and it in no way is intended to be an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any security, other investment or service, or to attract any funds or deposits. Investments mentioned may not be appropriate for all clients. Before making any investment, each investor should carefully consider the risks associated with the investment, as discussed in the applicable offering memorandum, and make a determination based upon their own particular circumstances, that the investment is consistent with their investment objectives and risk tolerance. Lower expenses do not guarantee better investment performance. Certain information contained herein may constitute forward-looking statements. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events, results or the performance of a fund may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements.
